Pravix Request a pilot →
An honest comparison

A self-hosted alternative to Flosum

This one comes down to architecture, not who's "more secure." Flosum runs entirely inside your Salesforce org. Pravix takes the opposite approach — it runs on your own infrastructure, keeping DevOps tooling off your production org. Both are valid; the right one depends on where you want your pipeline to live.

Request a pilot Compare side by side
✓ Runs on your own infrastructure ✓ Keeps tooling off your production org ✓ No per-seat enterprise pricing
Let's be fair

Flosum's native model is a genuine strength

Flosum is a strong, well-respected DevSecOps platform, and its defining trait is that it's 100% Salesforce-native — it runs entirely inside your org, so metadata never leaves Salesforce. For regulated industries that's a compelling story, and Flosum backs it with comprehensive backup and archive, its own version control, static code analysis, and native AI powered by Agentforce.

We won't pretend Pravix is "more secure" than that — Flosum's in-platform isolation is a legitimately strong model. The difference is philosophical: Flosum keeps everything inside Salesforce; Pravix keeps everything on infrastructure you control, outside the org. This page is for teams who prefer the second model.

The real decision

Two reasons teams prefer an external, self-hosted pipeline

Reason 01 — Keep tooling off the org

No managed package in production

A native tool installs as a managed package and runs inside your production org, consuming storage, API and governor-limit headroom. Pravix runs externally on your own infrastructure, so your DevOps tooling and its compute stay out of the org entirely — and aren't bound by Salesforce platform limits.

Reason 02 — Own the infrastructure & the cost

Your servers, seat-independent pricing

Pravix runs on your VPC, VPS or on-prem via Docker, giving you direct control of the host, region, retention and upgrades. And because cost is tied to that infrastructure rather than seats, it scales differently from enterprise per-seat platforms.

Side by side

Pravix vs Flosum

This table is about architecture and fit, not a scorecard. Flosum is strong where it's designed to be — and this says so.

Pravix Flosum
Architecture Self-hosted, external to the org 100% Salesforce-native (in-org)
Where it runs Your VPC / VPS / on-prem (Docker) Inside your Salesforce org (managed package)
Metadata handling Processed in your own infrastructure Never leaves Salesforce
Keeps tooling off the production org Yes — runs externally No — in-org by design
Pricing model Infrastructure-based (not per-seat) Enterprise platform pricing
Backup & archive Deployment-focused Comprehensive (Composite Backup)
AI AI risk scoring Native AI via Agentforce
Snapshot rollback Yes Yes
Auth & access MFA, SAML SSO, RBAC Inherits Salesforce security model
Best fit Teams who want DevOps off the org, on their own infra Teams who want everything to stay inside Salesforce
The honest trade-off

Two architectures, two sets of strengths

Why teams pick Pravix
  • DevOps tooling and compute stay off the production org
  • Runs on infrastructure you fully control
  • Not constrained by Salesforce platform limits
  • Cost tied to infrastructure, not seats
  • AI risk scoring, snapshot rollback, built-in Apex linter
  • MFA, SAML SSO and RBAC included
Why teams pick Flosum
  • Metadata never leaves Salesforce — strong native isolation
  • Comprehensive backup & archive
  • Native AI via Agentforce
  • Admin-friendly, no external Git/CLI required
  • Established DevSecOps pedigree for regulated industries

There's no universally "right" answer here. If your security model requires that nothing ever leaves Salesforce, Flosum is purpose-built for that. If you'd rather run your pipeline on your own infrastructure and keep heavy tooling out of your production org, Pravix is the alternative worth piloting.

Questions

Pravix vs Flosum, answered

Is Pravix a Flosum alternative?
Yes, for teams that prefer a different architecture. Flosum is 100% Salesforce-native and runs inside your org. Pravix runs self-hosted on your own infrastructure, outside the org, connecting via the Metadata API. The right choice depends on whether you want your DevOps tooling inside Salesforce or on your own infrastructure.
What's the difference between Pravix and Flosum?
Architecture. Flosum is a managed package running entirely within Salesforce, so metadata never leaves the platform. Pravix runs as Docker containers on your own VPC, VPS or on-prem, keeping DevOps tooling and compute off your production org. Flosum keeps everything in Salesforce; Pravix keeps everything on infrastructure you control.
Is Pravix more secure than Flosum?
Neither is simply more secure — they use different models. Flosum's native architecture means metadata never leaves Salesforce, a strong isolation story. Pravix keeps tooling and compute off the production org, on infrastructure you control. Which is preferable depends on your security architecture and where you want processing to happen.
Does Pravix run inside my Salesforce org like Flosum?
No — and that's by design. Flosum installs as a managed package inside your org. Pravix runs externally on your own infrastructure, which keeps tooling, storage and compute out of production and avoids Salesforce platform limits. It connects to your orgs over the Metadata API.
Is Pravix cheaper than Flosum?
It depends on your team and contract. Flosum is an enterprise platform with enterprise pricing. Pravix ties cost to the infrastructure you run it on rather than seats, which tends to favor smaller and mid-sized teams and consultancies. Compare against your actual Flosum quote, since enterprise pricing varies.
See for yourself

Run your pipeline on your own infrastructure

Pilot Pravix in your own environment and see a real, risk-scored, rollback-ready deployment — running off your production org, on infrastructure you control.

Request a pilot What is self-hosted DevOps?

Self-hosted licensing — talk to us about pricing for your team.